Worst Bridges in Washington

Bridges with the lowest condition ratings in Washington. Washington has 462 bridges in poor condition (5.5% of 8,474 total bridges).

8,474

Total Bridges

5.5%

In Poor Condition

462

Poor Bridges

10

Listed Below

Understanding Bridge Conditions in Washington

Washington's bridge infrastructure reflects decades of construction, maintenance, and replacement decisions influenced by geography, climate, traffic patterns, and available funding. With 462 bridges currently rated in poor condition (5.5% of the total inventory), understanding what these ratings mean helps residents and policymakers make informed decisions about infrastructure investment.

Federal inspectors evaluate three key components on every highway bridge: the deck (the driving surface and its immediate supports), the superstructure (beams, girders, trusses, or other primary load-carrying members), and the substructure (piers, abutments, and foundations that transfer loads to the ground). Each component receives a rating from 0 to 9, with the lowest of these three ratings determining the overall condition category. A rating of 4 or below classifies a bridge as “poor,” indicating significant structural deterioration that warrants prioritized attention.

Poor-rated bridges remain safe for use at their posted limits because federal law requires that any bridge with load-carrying deficiencies be either repaired, posted with weight restrictions, or closed. Many poor-rated bridges receive more frequent inspections than the standard 24-month cycle, allowing engineers to monitor deterioration rates and ensure conditions have not worsened beyond safe operating limits. Weight restrictions protect the structure while allowing continued service until rehabilitation or replacement can be funded and constructed.

Infrastructure investment decisions involve difficult trade-offs between maintaining aging structures and building new capacity. Bridges listed below represent the most deteriorated structures in Washington's inventory, where rehabilitation or replacement investment would have the greatest impact on improving overall infrastructure condition. Understanding where these bridges are located helps communities advocate for appropriate funding and plan alternative routes when load restrictions affect commercial traffic.

Condition Rating Scale

0-2

Failed to Critical

Closed or severely restricted. Major deterioration requiring immediate action.

3-4

Serious to Poor

Significant deterioration affecting capacity. Often weight-restricted.

5-6

Fair

Minor deterioration visible. Maintenance recommended but not urgent.

7-9

Good to Excellent

Components in sound condition with no significant deficiencies.

Lowest Rated Bridges in Washington

RankBridgeRatingYear BuiltCondition
#1I-82

over WASTEWATER NUMBER 3

8.4 E JCT US 97

01980Poor
#2US 101

over ELWHA RIVER

35.6 N JCT SR 113

21926Poor
#3SR 542

over BAGLEY CREEK

26.3 E JCT SR 547

21946Poor
#4TACOMA-VASHON TRAF

over PUGET SOUND

PT DEFIANCE-TACOMA

21958Poor
#5LIND AVE (88TH AVE

over I-405

2.1 N JCT I-5

21990Poor
#6CAMP CREEK ROAD

over CAMP CREEK

01.7 N JCT 7078

21971Poor
#7CRANBERRY ROAD

over DRAINAGE DITCH

0.1 E JCT SR 105

21971Poor
#8ROCKY CREEK RD

over ROCKY CREEK

.54 S JCT ALADDIN RD.

21964Poor
#9BROOKLYN ROAD

over GARRARD CREEK

0.6 W JCT 6888

21970Poor
#10MILL CREEK RD

over MILL CREEK

10.28 SE ISAACS AVE

21981Poor

Explore More

Data Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory 2024

Bridge inspection data is typically updated every 24 months. Conditions may have changed since the last inspection.

“Structurally deficient” does not mean a bridge is unsafe or likely to collapse. It indicates that one or more key structural elements are in poor or worse condition. Bridges are inspected regularly and may have load restrictions in place.

This data is for informational purposes only and should not be used for route clearance or vehicle weight decisions.