SR 26
over PALOUSE RIVER
16.1 E JCT SR 127, Whitman County, Washington
Condition
PoorYear Built
1937
Daily Traffic
3,142
Length
60 ft
About This Bridge
SR 26 carries traffic over PALOUSE RIVER in Whitman County, Washington. Built in 1937, this structure is 89 years old, making it a historic structure that has served the community for generations. The bridge features concrete continuous construction with a tee beam design, a combination chosen by engineers to meet the specific requirements of this crossing.
Approximately 3,142 vehicles cross this bridge daily, indicating lower traffic volumes common for local roads and rural routes. While traffic is lighter, these bridges still serve essential community transportation needs. Commercial trucks account for 30% of all crossings. This heavy commercial usage significantly impacts structural wear, as a single fully-loaded truck can cause as much deck wear as thousands of passenger vehicles. Transportation planners factor this into maintenance scheduling and budget allocation.
The bridge is currently rated in poor condition based on federal inspection criteria established by the Federal Highway Administration. It is classified as structurally deficient, meaning one or more components have received a rating of 4 or below on the 0-9 scale. This designation indicates significant deterioration that warrants attention, though the bridge remains safe for travel within its posted limits. Structurally deficient does not mean unsafe—rather, it signals that repairs or replacement should be prioritized in transportation planning. With a total length of 60 feet, this is a shorter span typical of local road crossings, often carrying traffic over small streams, drainage channels, or other roadways.
The construction materials used in this bridge were selected based on engineering requirements, cost considerations, and local conditions at the time of construction.
Federal law requires that all highway bridges be inspected at least every 24 months by qualified inspectors following the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS). Some bridges with known issues or unusual characteristics may be inspected more frequently. Inspection data is reported to the National Bridge Inventory, a database maintained by the Federal Highway Administration that tracks the condition of all public highway bridges in the United States. This bridge data is sourced from that federal database and reflects the most recent available inspection results.
Condition Ratings
Structurally Deficient
This bridge has one or more component ratings of 4 or below, indicating significant deterioration that requires attention. The bridge remains safe for travel but may have load restrictions.
Deck Condition
Serious
Superstructure
Satisfactory
Substructure
Fair
Channel & Protection
Very Good
Lowest Rating
Determines condition category
NBI condition ratings range from 0 (failed) to 9 (excellent). Ratings of 4 or below are considered poor. The overall condition category is determined by the lowest individual component rating.
The deck rating of 3 indicates serious deterioration with section loss or spalling.
For a structure built in 1937, the current condition reflects the cumulative effects of age, traffic, and environmental exposure.
Bridge Details
Concrete Continuous is the primary structural material, which influences maintenance requirements and expected lifespan. The tee beam design was selected based on span requirements, load capacity needs, and site conditions at the time of construction. Maintenance responsibility falls to State Highway Agency.
Construction
Dimensions
Span dimensions affect structural design choices and load distribution. The deck area of 1,727 sq ft determines surface maintenance scope.
Classification
Status
Traffic Data
Traffic volume data helps engineers assess bridge wear patterns and plan maintenance schedules. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts are updated periodically and represent typical weekday usage.
3,142
Avg Daily Traffic (2022)
Vehicles per day crossing this bridge
30%
Truck Traffic
Commercial vehicle percentage
3,475
Projected Future ADT
Estimated future demand
This bridge carries approximately 3,142 vehicles per day, translating to roughly 1,146,830 crossings annually. Lower traffic volumes generally result in less structural wear over time.
Commercial trucks comprise 30% of traffic. Heavy vehicles cause disproportionate wear—a single fully loaded truck can have the impact of thousands of passenger cars on bridge deck surfaces. This high percentage of truck traffic may accelerate deterioration of deck surfaces and structural components.
Traffic projections estimate future volumes of 3,475 vehicles daily, a 11% increase from current levels. These projections inform capacity planning and potential upgrade requirements.
Load Ratings
Load ratings determine what weight this bridge can safely support. These values are critical for routing heavy vehicles and issuing overweight permits.
Operating Rating
3.0 tons
Maximum allowable load for special permits
Inventory Rating
1.8 tons
Load level for normal traffic
The operating rating of 3.0 tons represents the absolute maximum load this bridge can carry under controlled conditions with special permits. The inventory rating of 1.8 tons is the safe load limit for everyday traffic without restrictions. These relatively low ratings may result in posted weight limits or route restrictions for heavy vehicles.
5-Year Condition Trend
↓DecliningCondition has declined by 1.0 rating points since 2020
Data: 2020-2024 FHWA National Bridge Inventory
Location
Loading map...
47.636111, -118.255556
Identification
Explore More
Data Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory 2024
Bridge inspection data is typically updated every 24 months. Conditions may have changed since the last inspection.
“Structurally deficient” does not mean a bridge is unsafe or likely to collapse. It indicates that one or more key structural elements are in poor or worse condition. Bridges are inspected regularly and may have load restrictions in place.
This data is for informational purposes only and should not be used for route clearance or vehicle weight decisions.