Worst Bridges in South Dakota
Bridges with the lowest condition ratings in South Dakota. South Dakota has 963 bridges in poor condition (16.4% of 5,887 total bridges).
5,887
Total Bridges
16.4%
In Poor Condition
963
Poor Bridges
10
Listed Below
Understanding Bridge Conditions in South Dakota
South Dakota's bridge infrastructure reflects decades of construction, maintenance, and replacement decisions influenced by geography, climate, traffic patterns, and available funding. With 963 bridges currently rated in poor condition (16.4% of the total inventory), understanding what these ratings mean helps residents and policymakers make informed decisions about infrastructure investment.
Federal inspectors evaluate three key components on every highway bridge: the deck (the driving surface and its immediate supports), the superstructure (beams, girders, trusses, or other primary load-carrying members), and the substructure (piers, abutments, and foundations that transfer loads to the ground). Each component receives a rating from 0 to 9, with the lowest of these three ratings determining the overall condition category. A rating of 4 or below classifies a bridge as “poor,” indicating significant structural deterioration that warrants prioritized attention.
Poor-rated bridges remain safe for use at their posted limits because federal law requires that any bridge with load-carrying deficiencies be either repaired, posted with weight restrictions, or closed. Many poor-rated bridges receive more frequent inspections than the standard 24-month cycle, allowing engineers to monitor deterioration rates and ensure conditions have not worsened beyond safe operating limits. Weight restrictions protect the structure while allowing continued service until rehabilitation or replacement can be funded and constructed.
Infrastructure investment decisions involve difficult trade-offs between maintaining aging structures and building new capacity. Bridges listed below represent the most deteriorated structures in South Dakota's inventory, where rehabilitation or replacement investment would have the greatest impact on improving overall infrastructure condition. Understanding where these bridges are located helps communities advocate for appropriate funding and plan alternative routes when load restrictions affect commercial traffic.
Condition Rating Scale
Failed to Critical
Closed or severely restricted. Major deterioration requiring immediate action.
Serious to Poor
Significant deterioration affecting capacity. Often weight-restricted.
Fair
Minor deterioration visible. Maintenance recommended but not urgent.
Good to Excellent
Components in sound condition with no significant deficiencies.
Lowest Rated Bridges in South Dakota
| Rank | Bridge | Rating | Year Built | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 412th Avenue over Middle Pearl Creek 5.1S & 3E of Cavour | 0 | 1930 | Poor |
| #2 | EICHER RD over HORSE CK 3.2 S NEWELL.8E US79 | 0 | 1950 | Poor |
| #3 | 476 AVE over CK 2.0W & 5.1S MILBANK | 0 | 1901 | Poor |
| #4 | 368 AVE over WOLF CK 8 E & 9.9 N MILLER | 0 | 1915 | Poor |
| #5 | 211 AVENUE over WHITEWATER CK 2E & 4S COTTONWOOD | 0 | 1940 | Poor |
| #6 | 425 AVE over ROCK CK 10.0W & 0.9S CANOVA | 0 | 1920 | Poor |
| #7 | 41480 299th Street over Emanuel Creek 4N & 1.2W of Tyndall | 1 | 1905 | Poor |
| #8 | GAVER ROAD over REDWATER RV 1.5S 1.5E B. FOURCHE | 1 | 1920 | Poor |
| #9 | YPPARILLA RD over CK 3 N .4 W NEWELL | 1 | 1960 | Poor |
| #10 | 29810 466 ST. over ASH CK 1.2S & 14E IRENE | 1 | 1940 | Poor |
Explore More
Data Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory 2024
Bridge inspection data is typically updated every 24 months. Conditions may have changed since the last inspection.
“Structurally deficient” does not mean a bridge is unsafe or likely to collapse. It indicates that one or more key structural elements are in poor or worse condition. Bridges are inspected regularly and may have load restrictions in place.
This data is for informational purposes only and should not be used for route clearance or vehicle weight decisions.