Worst Bridges in Ohio
Bridges with the lowest condition ratings in Ohio. Ohio has 1,267 bridges in poor condition (4.7% of 26,729 total bridges).
26,729
Total Bridges
4.7%
In Poor Condition
1,267
Poor Bridges
10
Listed Below
Understanding Bridge Conditions in Ohio
Ohio's bridge infrastructure reflects decades of construction, maintenance, and replacement decisions influenced by geography, climate, traffic patterns, and available funding. With 1,267 bridges currently rated in poor condition (4.7% of the total inventory), understanding what these ratings mean helps residents and policymakers make informed decisions about infrastructure investment.
Federal inspectors evaluate three key components on every highway bridge: the deck (the driving surface and its immediate supports), the superstructure (beams, girders, trusses, or other primary load-carrying members), and the substructure (piers, abutments, and foundations that transfer loads to the ground). Each component receives a rating from 0 to 9, with the lowest of these three ratings determining the overall condition category. A rating of 4 or below classifies a bridge as “poor,” indicating significant structural deterioration that warrants prioritized attention.
Poor-rated bridges remain safe for use at their posted limits because federal law requires that any bridge with load-carrying deficiencies be either repaired, posted with weight restrictions, or closed. Many poor-rated bridges receive more frequent inspections than the standard 24-month cycle, allowing engineers to monitor deterioration rates and ensure conditions have not worsened beyond safe operating limits. Weight restrictions protect the structure while allowing continued service until rehabilitation or replacement can be funded and constructed.
Infrastructure investment decisions involve difficult trade-offs between maintaining aging structures and building new capacity. Bridges listed below represent the most deteriorated structures in Ohio's inventory, where rehabilitation or replacement investment would have the greatest impact on improving overall infrastructure condition. Understanding where these bridges are located helps communities advocate for appropriate funding and plan alternative routes when load restrictions affect commercial traffic.
Condition Rating Scale
Failed to Critical
Closed or severely restricted. Major deterioration requiring immediate action.
Serious to Poor
Significant deterioration affecting capacity. Often weight-restricted.
Fair
Minor deterioration visible. Maintenance recommended but not urgent.
Good to Excellent
Components in sound condition with no significant deficiencies.
Lowest Rated Bridges in Ohio
| Rank | Bridge | Rating | Year Built | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | REDDINGTON HILL RD over TRAIL RUN 300 FT S OF SR331 | 0 | 1910 | Poor |
| #2 | TOWNSHIP RD 9435 over STREAM .2 MI S OF STATE HWY 265 | 0 | 1930 | Poor |
| #3 | Twp. Rd. H1 over BEAVER CREEK (CLOSED) 0.1 mi. west of Rd. 2 | 0 | 1925 | Poor |
| #4 | Twp. Rd. 8C over 1157 N TURKEY FOOT(CLOSE 0.20 mi. north of CR 424 | 0 | 1900 | Poor |
| #5 | Twp. Rd. 16B over DITCH 1179 (CLOSED) 0.05 mi. south of Rd. N | 0 | 1916 | Poor |
| #6 | WEST AVENUE over CLOSED (MAHONING RIVER) 0.2 MI. N. OF MAHONING AV | 0 | 1929 | Poor |
| #7 | CR125 over CLOSED .10 MI.E.OF INT.OF SR42 | 0 | 1888 | Poor |
| #8 | TOWNSHIP ROAD 99 over GORDON CREEK 0.1 MI N OF JCT C230 | 0 | 1895 | Poor |
| #9 | COLD SPRINGS ROAD over TRIB L. MIAMI R (CLOSED) 0.67 mi E of TR 83 | 0 | 1910 | Poor |
| #10 | HORTON ROAD over CONNEAUT CREEK .5 MI. N. OF HATCHES COR. | 1 | 1900 | Poor |
Explore More
Data Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory 2024
Bridge inspection data is typically updated every 24 months. Conditions may have changed since the last inspection.
“Structurally deficient” does not mean a bridge is unsafe or likely to collapse. It indicates that one or more key structural elements are in poor or worse condition. Bridges are inspected regularly and may have load restrictions in place.
This data is for informational purposes only and should not be used for route clearance or vehicle weight decisions.