Worst Bridges in New Jersey
Bridges with the lowest condition ratings in New Jersey. New Jersey has 410 bridges in poor condition (6.0% of 6,827 total bridges).
6,827
Total Bridges
6.0%
In Poor Condition
410
Poor Bridges
10
Listed Below
Understanding Bridge Conditions in New Jersey
New Jersey's bridge infrastructure reflects decades of construction, maintenance, and replacement decisions influenced by geography, climate, traffic patterns, and available funding. With 410 bridges currently rated in poor condition (6.0% of the total inventory), understanding what these ratings mean helps residents and policymakers make informed decisions about infrastructure investment.
Federal inspectors evaluate three key components on every highway bridge: the deck (the driving surface and its immediate supports), the superstructure (beams, girders, trusses, or other primary load-carrying members), and the substructure (piers, abutments, and foundations that transfer loads to the ground). Each component receives a rating from 0 to 9, with the lowest of these three ratings determining the overall condition category. A rating of 4 or below classifies a bridge as “poor,” indicating significant structural deterioration that warrants prioritized attention.
Poor-rated bridges remain safe for use at their posted limits because federal law requires that any bridge with load-carrying deficiencies be either repaired, posted with weight restrictions, or closed. Many poor-rated bridges receive more frequent inspections than the standard 24-month cycle, allowing engineers to monitor deterioration rates and ensure conditions have not worsened beyond safe operating limits. Weight restrictions protect the structure while allowing continued service until rehabilitation or replacement can be funded and constructed.
Infrastructure investment decisions involve difficult trade-offs between maintaining aging structures and building new capacity. Bridges listed below represent the most deteriorated structures in New Jersey's inventory, where rehabilitation or replacement investment would have the greatest impact on improving overall infrastructure condition. Understanding where these bridges are located helps communities advocate for appropriate funding and plan alternative routes when load restrictions affect commercial traffic.
Condition Rating Scale
Failed to Critical
Closed or severely restricted. Major deterioration requiring immediate action.
Serious to Poor
Significant deterioration affecting capacity. Often weight-restricted.
Fair
Minor deterioration visible. Maintenance recommended but not urgent.
Good to Excellent
Components in sound condition with no significant deficiencies.
Lowest Rated Bridges in New Jersey
| Rank | Bridge | Rating | Year Built | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | GILBERT ROAD over ASSISCUNK CREEK .75 MI.SO. OF 528 SPUR | 1 | 1900 | Poor |
| #2 | RYMON ROAD over MUSCONETCONG RIVER 0.1 MILE NO OF CR 645 JCT | 1 | 1868 | Poor |
| #3 | HAMP ROAD over ALEXAUKEN CREEK 0.25 MI. WEST OF US 202 | 2 | 1900 | Poor |
| #4 | US 40 & NJ 50 over GREAT EGG HARBOR RIVER 4.98 MI W OF 40-322 JCT | 3 | 1928 | Poor |
| #5 | WEYMOUTH RD CR640 over ATLANTIC CITY LINE 2.4MI SE of US30&NJ54 JCT | 3 | 1937 | Poor |
| #6 | OHIO AVENUE over VENICE LAGOON 80 FT EAST OF MURRAY AVE | 3 | 1969 | Poor |
| #7 | NJ 4 over PALSD AV WNDSR RD&CSX RR 3.65 MI EAST OF RT 17 | 3 | 1931 | Poor |
| #8 | NJ 4 over TEANECK ROAD 4.0MI EAST OF NJ 17 | 3 | 1931 | Poor |
| #9 | US 9W over I-95 US1 9 & 46 & NJ 4 0.62 MI W of GWB | 3 | 1930 | Poor |
| #10 | NJ 17 over WEST CENTRAL AVENUE 1.0 MI NORTH OF I 80 | 3 | 1931 | Poor |
Explore More
Data Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory 2024
Bridge inspection data is typically updated every 24 months. Conditions may have changed since the last inspection.
“Structurally deficient” does not mean a bridge is unsafe or likely to collapse. It indicates that one or more key structural elements are in poor or worse condition. Bridges are inspected regularly and may have load restrictions in place.
This data is for informational purposes only and should not be used for route clearance or vehicle weight decisions.