Worst Bridges in Arkansas
Bridges with the lowest condition ratings in Arkansas. Arkansas has 704 bridges in poor condition (5.4% of 12,974 total bridges).
12,974
Total Bridges
5.4%
In Poor Condition
704
Poor Bridges
10
Listed Below
Understanding Bridge Conditions in Arkansas
Arkansas's bridge infrastructure reflects decades of construction, maintenance, and replacement decisions influenced by geography, climate, traffic patterns, and available funding. With 704 bridges currently rated in poor condition (5.4% of the total inventory), understanding what these ratings mean helps residents and policymakers make informed decisions about infrastructure investment.
Federal inspectors evaluate three key components on every highway bridge: the deck (the driving surface and its immediate supports), the superstructure (beams, girders, trusses, or other primary load-carrying members), and the substructure (piers, abutments, and foundations that transfer loads to the ground). Each component receives a rating from 0 to 9, with the lowest of these three ratings determining the overall condition category. A rating of 4 or below classifies a bridge as “poor,” indicating significant structural deterioration that warrants prioritized attention.
Poor-rated bridges remain safe for use at their posted limits because federal law requires that any bridge with load-carrying deficiencies be either repaired, posted with weight restrictions, or closed. Many poor-rated bridges receive more frequent inspections than the standard 24-month cycle, allowing engineers to monitor deterioration rates and ensure conditions have not worsened beyond safe operating limits. Weight restrictions protect the structure while allowing continued service until rehabilitation or replacement can be funded and constructed.
Infrastructure investment decisions involve difficult trade-offs between maintaining aging structures and building new capacity. Bridges listed below represent the most deteriorated structures in Arkansas's inventory, where rehabilitation or replacement investment would have the greatest impact on improving overall infrastructure condition. Understanding where these bridges are located helps communities advocate for appropriate funding and plan alternative routes when load restrictions affect commercial traffic.
Condition Rating Scale
Failed to Critical
Closed or severely restricted. Major deterioration requiring immediate action.
Serious to Poor
Significant deterioration affecting capacity. Often weight-restricted.
Fair
Minor deterioration visible. Maintenance recommended but not urgent.
Good to Excellent
Components in sound condition with no significant deficiencies.
Lowest Rated Bridges in Arkansas
| Rank | Bridge | Rating | Year Built | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | BOWEN BR. C.R. 244 over LITTLE MO RIVER .75 M S SH 301 | 0 | 1944 | Poor |
| #2 | Kings Ranch Road over Tanner Creek - Wash Co 0.1 MI WEST CO RD 6 | 0 | 1987 | Poor |
| #3 | N Redding St W Mem over Ten Mile Bayou .76 Miles North Jct Us 70 | 0 | 1987 | Poor |
| #4 | Cincinnati Cr. Rd. over Cincinnati Creek-Wash 2.29 MI N SH 59 | 0 | 1991 | Poor |
| #5 | ShawneeDropZone Rd over Creek-Ft. Chaffee BR 016 0.87 Mi W Jct Hwy 96 | 0 | 1939 | Poor |
| #6 | Cr-929/Z-G/L-6.79 over Flat Fork Creek 1.65 Mi S OfJct 930 & 929 | 1 | 1955 | Poor |
| #7 | Auburn Rd Chaffee over Creek BR 036 3.75 mi N of Lone Star Ch | 1 | 1941 | Poor |
| #8 | SH 195 - 03 - 6.32 over TRIBBLE CREEK .5 MI S JCT SH 371 & 195 | 1 | 1967 | Poor |
| #9 | CR20 -G 911- 108 over Union Pacific Railroad 0.91 M E Jct. SH 349 | 2 | 1957 | Poor |
| #10 | CR 42-C(911=W346) over PEMISCOT BAYOU 1.4 M E J CO 93 & 42 | 2 | 1975 | Poor |
Explore More
Data Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory 2024
Bridge inspection data is typically updated every 24 months. Conditions may have changed since the last inspection.
“Structurally deficient” does not mean a bridge is unsafe or likely to collapse. It indicates that one or more key structural elements are in poor or worse condition. Bridges are inspected regularly and may have load restrictions in place.
This data is for informational purposes only and should not be used for route clearance or vehicle weight decisions.