I-64 WB
over TR-422 & WABASH RV
04.37 W SR 69, Posey County, Indiana
Condition
PoorYear Built
1967
Daily Traffic
6,300
Length
271 ft
About This Bridge
I-64 WB carries traffic over TR-422 & WABASH RV in Posey County, Indiana. Built in 1967, this structure is 59 years old, placing it among the older bridges still in active service. The bridge features steel continuous construction with a girder and floorbeam design, a combination chosen by engineers to meet the specific requirements of this crossing.
Approximately 6,300 vehicles cross this bridge daily, indicating lower traffic volumes common for local roads and rural routes. While traffic is lighter, these bridges still serve essential community transportation needs. Commercial trucks account for 40% of all crossings. This heavy commercial usage significantly impacts structural wear, as a single fully-loaded truck can cause as much deck wear as thousands of passenger vehicles. Transportation planners factor this into maintenance scheduling and budget allocation.
The bridge is currently rated in poor condition based on federal inspection criteria established by the Federal Highway Administration. It is classified as structurally deficient, meaning one or more components have received a rating of 4 or below on the 0-9 scale. This designation indicates significant deterioration that warrants attention, though the bridge remains safe for travel within its posted limits. Structurally deficient does not mean unsafe—rather, it signals that repairs or replacement should be prioritized in transportation planning. With a total length of 271 feet, this structure falls within the typical range requiring standard inspection procedures conducted by certified bridge inspectors.
The construction materials used in this bridge were selected based on engineering requirements, cost considerations, and local conditions at the time of construction.
Federal law requires that all highway bridges be inspected at least every 24 months by qualified inspectors following the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS). Some bridges with known issues or unusual characteristics may be inspected more frequently. Inspection data is reported to the National Bridge Inventory, a database maintained by the Federal Highway Administration that tracks the condition of all public highway bridges in the United States. This bridge data is sourced from that federal database and reflects the most recent available inspection results.
Condition Ratings
Structurally Deficient
This bridge has one or more component ratings of 4 or below, indicating significant deterioration that requires attention. The bridge remains safe for travel but may have load restrictions.
Deck Condition
Satisfactory
Superstructure
Serious
Substructure
Fair
Channel & Protection
Fair
Lowest Rating
Determines condition category
NBI condition ratings range from 0 (failed) to 9 (excellent). Ratings of 4 or below are considered poor. The overall condition category is determined by the lowest individual component rating.
The superstructure rating of 3 shows serious section loss affecting structural capacity.
For a structure built in 1967, the current condition reflects the cumulative effects of age, traffic, and environmental exposure.
Bridge Details
Steel Continuous is the primary structural material, which influences maintenance requirements and expected lifespan. The girder and floorbeam design was selected based on span requirements, load capacity needs, and site conditions at the time of construction. Maintenance responsibility falls to State Highway Agency.
Construction
Dimensions
Span dimensions affect structural design choices and load distribution. The deck area of 9,070 sq ft determines surface maintenance scope.
Classification
Status
Traffic Data
Traffic volume data helps engineers assess bridge wear patterns and plan maintenance schedules. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts are updated periodically and represent typical weekday usage.
6,300
Avg Daily Traffic (2017)
Vehicles per day crossing this bridge
40%
Truck Traffic
Commercial vehicle percentage
5,762
Projected Future ADT
Estimated future demand
This bridge carries approximately 6,300 vehicles per day, translating to roughly 2,299,500 crossings annually. Lower traffic volumes generally result in less structural wear over time.
Commercial trucks comprise 40% of traffic. Heavy vehicles cause disproportionate wear—a single fully loaded truck can have the impact of thousands of passenger cars on bridge deck surfaces. This high percentage of truck traffic may accelerate deterioration of deck surfaces and structural components.
Traffic projections estimate future volumes of 5,762 vehicles daily, a decrease from current levels. These projections inform capacity planning and potential upgrade requirements.
Load Ratings
Load ratings determine what weight this bridge can safely support. These values are critical for routing heavy vehicles and issuing overweight permits.
Operating Rating
5.0 tons
Maximum allowable load for special permits
Inventory Rating
3.0 tons
Load level for normal traffic
The operating rating of 5.0 tons represents the absolute maximum load this bridge can carry under controlled conditions with special permits. The inventory rating of 3.0 tons is the safe load limit for everyday traffic without restrictions. These relatively low ratings may result in posted weight limits or route restrictions for heavy vehicles.
5-Year Condition Trend
→StableCondition has remained relatively stable since 2020
Data: 2020-2024 FHWA National Bridge Inventory
Location
Loading map...
39.440833, -88.308056
Identification
Explore More
Data Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory 2024
Bridge inspection data is typically updated every 24 months. Conditions may have changed since the last inspection.
“Structurally deficient” does not mean a bridge is unsafe or likely to collapse. It indicates that one or more key structural elements are in poor or worse condition. Bridges are inspected regularly and may have load restrictions in place.
This data is for informational purposes only and should not be used for route clearance or vehicle weight decisions.